Collection Playing Habits
- humble start, will possibly develop
The Carafas of Maddaloni: Naples Under Spanish Dominion
- by Alfred von Reumont (1854) / Gambling habits at begin 17th century

An Account of the Manners and Customs of Italy ... - By Giuseppe Marco Antonio Baretti, from 1768 CHAP. XXXIII (Card games)
"The man would certainly appear
extraordinary, is not ridiculous, who
should attempt to appreciate the different
degrees of mental power possessed by the
chief European nations, when considered
as bodies opposed to bodies, and endeavour
to form his estimate, either by
drawing inferences from those portions of
wit that they must necessarily employ
when they play at their national games of
cards, and from those resources of genius
that must have been possessed by those
amongst their respective predecessors, who
first invented those games.
Forbearing therefore to enter into this
subtle and odd disquisition, I will only
observe, that it is not without reason the
English are proud of their Whist, the
French of their Piquet, and the Spaniards
of their Hombre, which, as I take it, are
the three best games of cards amongst the
several that their nations possess. To obtain
a victory or to hinder a defeat at any
of these games, requires so much quick-
and dexterity of mind, that I do not wonder
is even men of good parts are
flattered when they are praised for this,
accomplishment.
Which of these three games required
the greater effort in the intention, or demands most skill in the management, I
will not take upon me to determine: but I
think myself well intitled to say, that
three or four of our Italian games of cards
are almost as superiour in both respects to
Whist, to Piquet, and to Hombre, as chess
is superiour to polish-drafts. The games
I mean, are those which we form out of those
cards called Minchiate and Tarrocco's:
the first chiefly in vogue all over Tuscany
and the Pope's dominions; the sccond in
Piedmont and Lombardy. I crave the
reader's indulgence for endeavouring to
give him 'some idea of both these games, make him sensible, that the Italians,
who have often appeared great in the arts -
considered by mankind as great, are likewise
great in those that mankind will regard
as little.
Both the Minchiate and the Tarrocco's
consist of five suits instead of four, as common cards do. Four of those five
suits answer exactly to the four of the
common cards, with only the addition of
one card to the three that are figured in
each suit; so that, instead of king, queen,
and knave, we have king, queen, horseman, and knave, both in the Minchiate
and the Tarrocco's. As to the fifth suit,
it consists of forty-one cards in the Minchiate,
and of twenty-two in the Tarrocco's ;
and
this fifth suit in both games is called
by a name that answers to trumps in
English. Both games may be played by
only two, or only three people in several
ways; but the most ingenious as well as
the most in use, are two or three games
that are played by four people; and more
especially one which is played by one
against three, much as the the ruling principle
of Hombre, and another played two
against two, not unlike Whist.
By this account the reader will soon
comprehend, that each of those games
must necessarily be much superiour to
Whist and Hombre, because of the greater
number of combinations produced either by
the ninety-seven cards of the Minchiate, or
by the seventy-eight of Tarocco ; which
combinations cannot but give a larger
scope to the imagination of the player
than the lesser number arising from the
forty of Hombre, or the fifty-two of Whist,
and oblige him to exert his memory and
judgment much more than either at Whist,
Hombre, or Piquet.
I have heard strangers, unable to comprehend
any of these our games, object
both to the Tarocco's and the Minchiate,
that they cannot be so diverting as the
three mentioned, because they produce
so many combinations as must prove too
satiguing. But is this argument carries
conviction, we must of course conclude,
that chess is less delightsul than loo, because
it forces the mind to a greater recollection
of its powers than loo. This
reasoning is certainly just with regard to
little and sluggish minds; but will not
hold with respect to those that are lively
and comprehensive. However, those Italians,
whose minds are much too contracted
and disproportioned to the Tarrocco's
and the Minchiate, or those who do
not choose to exert their talents too much,
have still the means of diverting themselves with several other games at cards
that require no greater compass of imagination, memory and understanding, than
Whist, Piquet, and Hombre : and other
still, that are upon a pretty equal footing •
with humble loo itself.
Let me add an observation more upon
this subject. Many strangers are surprised
that the Italians learn their games easily,
and in a very little time play at them with
as much skill as the best players among
themselves. Hence they infer very kindly
that Italy abounds in gamblers more than
their own respective countries. But is
this inference very logical? I apprehend
they would say better, if they would be
pleased to say, that the Italians, accustomed to more complicated games, can
easily descend to play those, which, comparatively speaking, require
less wit and less attention.
I have not wrote this short chapter
for the perusal of those who make it a
point to contemn all frivolous amusements,
and look upon themselves with great reverence
because they always detested gaming.
I intend it only for those connoisseurs in
ingenuity, who know that cards have not
only the power of rescuing the ordinary
part of mankind from the torpid encroachments of dulness, but of affording also an
efficacious refreshmerit even to the thinker,
after a long run of deep meditation."
Minchiate article - with references to Baretti:
A Descriptive Catalogue of Playing and Other Cards in the British Museum ... By William Hughes Willshire
|